Homeopathic Medical Society of the

State of Pennsylvania

Our own Jack Borneman presented this month at the Homeopathic Medical Society of the State of Pennsylvania’s 143rd Annual Meeting. The Homeopathic Medical Society of the State of Pennsylvania (HMSSP) was established in 1865 to organize and support the homeopathic medical profession in Pennsylvania.

Jack has put together an interesting talk and handout that shows the history of homeopathy in the United States and the current state of the industry. We thought you might be interested in taking a look at the handout as well so it is included below.

HMSSP Conference Handout


Conference Presentation Notes:

Thank you for the invitation to share my memories of family, homeopathy and its regulation.  These are all so tightly interwoven that I use a time line to tease them apart. Let me tell you of my homeopathic heroes, and then we will use a calendar to keep track of events.

My personal heroes are Constantine Hering, Royal Copeland, Harris Coulter, Julian Winston, Wyrth Baker and Sandra Chase.  Dr. Hering, reflected accurately the teachings and experiments of Hahnemann, codified, promoted and defended the homeopathic medical method espoused by Hahnemann, never straying from the proving and law of similars as the theoretical basis for homeopathy.  The success of the homeopathic method of Cure in the US can be attributed to Dr. Hering.  Royal Copeland’s courage and determination included the HPUS in the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) of 1938. That action finds its importance and relevance today in the recent (Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) activity.  Harris Coulter’s writings are a brilliant explanation and defense of the homeopathic method of cure.  Wyrth’s understanding of political events, intuition, foresight, courage and organizational skills are the foundation of the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia Convention of the United States (HPCUS). He reorganized a homeopathic pharmacopoeia, which had languished as a cookbook, with no major charges, for eight printings (editions) and gave us a world renowned Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS) This HPUS is useful to the homeopathic community, patients, consumers, practitioners, industry and regulators.  Julian generously shared his keen observations and analysis of the homeopathic universe. He helped put things in focus for me. His report of his “trip” across the country was a revelation. The Faces of Homeopathy is a ready reference for all things homeopathic.  Sandra has been my conscience on the Board of Directors with her “Now Jack”! Sandra serves on 8 homeopathic boards (AIHF, AIH, ABHt, HPCUS, LMHI, HMSSP, SHMA, and HAA) and I is among the executive officers of 6 of them (AIHF, VP; ABHt, Pres; HPCUS, Sec; LMHI, Sec for PR; HMSSP, Sec; and SHMA, Sec-Treas). Sandra is a Trustee on the AIH Board and the ABHt Representative to the HAA Board.

Hopefully, an understanding of the homeopathic history and regulatory process will help us understand the regulatory environment within which homeopathy must exist in today.  We are so fortunate. This geographic area, beginning in Allentown and later Philadelphia, is steeped in homeopathic lore and flora.

THE HISTORY

1810 Constantine Hering arrived in Philadelphia

1810 The Allentown Academy opened the first Homeopathic College. Lectures and texts were in German.

THE INDUSTRY

1841 Otis Clapp – began in Boston
1852 Boericke & Tafel (B&T) began operations
1869 organized nine branches
1853 Luties (St Louis)
1857 Humphreys (NY) Later Manhattan and Caribbean, now owned by American Distillers makers of Dickinson’s Witch Hazel
1867 Hahnemann Medical College (HMC)
1870 B&T starts a branch in San Francisco
1880 Washington Homeopathic Pharmacy (WHP)
1905 Hylands (Standard Homeopathic Company)(SHC)
1910 Grandad, Dr. Borneman, and Urban Ehrhart leave Boericke & Tafel (B&T) to start their own homeopathic pharmacies.
1910 Dr. Borneman begins manufacturing and growing botanicals in Norwood.
1911 Ehrhart & Karl (E&K) Chicago
Markets were regional and fiercely competitive. Industry was in a state of decline. Physician dispensing habits did not foster a viable industry capable of research and dealing with adversaries and the FDA.
1910 Flexner Report by the Carnegie Fdn. had a devastating effect on Homeopathic hospitals, colleges and the growth of homeopathy.
Promised funding from Carnegie/Rockefeller was not forthcoming.
1915 Dr. Borneman’s sales office 615 N 15th St. was a meeting place for students, across from nurse’s residence
1915 Dr. Borneman appointed chief pharmacist at Hahnemann Hospital.
1918 Dr. Borneman teaches medical Botany, pharmacognosy and prescription writing at HMC
1924 A H.M.C catalog lists as graduates our best customers who practiced 26 years before I joined the business.
1929 Homeopathic courses cease at HMC
1938 Royal Copeland FDCA
1940 Homeopathy at HMC becomes elective.
HMSPA meetings at Skytop, Galen Hall, Pocono Manor, Mt Pocono, Hershey, Bellveue Stratford
1951 Durham Humphrey Act established Rx/OTC Categories OTC business begins.
1950 Industry was B&T, Borneman, Otis Clapp, E&K, B&R, SHC, WHP, Humphreys and Luyties.
1950 Grandad ceases teaching at Hahnemann
1950 Bornemans survived by preparing combinations remedies, parenterals and physician
supplies.
1952 I graduate PCP&S and formally join the business
1955 Homeopathy is no longer an elective course at Hahnemann.

REGULATORY CHALLENGES
1951 Durham Humphrey
1962 Kefauver/Kennedy amendments “Drug Amendments Act 1962
1962 FDA assumes all homeopathics are RX and no new remedies (failed)
1974 Dr. Baker publishes Compendium of Homeotherapeutics. Roger Ehrhart, Forest Murphy, Alan Neiswander, Gus Tafel, Henry Williams, Bill Young.
1978 Science of Homeopathy Vithoulkas published
1979 Proposal to change HPUS regulatory status (failed)

TURBULENT TIMES 1980s

The native industry languished and was suffering from the effects of Flexner Report, closing of hospitals and colleges. Hahnemann graduates were in an advanced age. Lacking energy and resources we had to deal with adversaries and the FDA.
1980 Influx of homeopathic Drug Products (HDPs) from Europe: Electro-acupuncture Voll (EAV) nosode & parenteral remedies causes FDA alarm.
FDA questions homeopathic status of Anthroposophic, Phytopharmaceuticals, and Nosodes and tries the big net approach.
1980 Dr Baker reincorporates the HPCUS that had eight Editions (printings) and was no longer relevant.
HPCUS Begins 20 year review of all remedies in HPUS, Compendium, anthroposophic and sponsored remedies. (Oscillo)
1982-88 FDA meetings lay ground for Compliance Policy Guide (CPG). Sandra Chase, Bill Sheven, Wyrth Baker, Will Eldredge (Humphreys) and myself.
HPUS included in FDA act 1938, homeopathic drug products were generally unregulated until May 1988 with publication of the Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) 1732.15. (See web FDA CPG 400.400)
1982 Boiron Borneman Merge
1988 C.P.G. Established invest able environment too late to save the native industry.
1988 Decline of US firms and beginnings of Boiron, Dolisos, Heel, DHU (Schwabe),
1988 FDA upset by Influx of ”new” homeopathics”, Bach, Parenterals Nosodes, Sarcodes, Organotherapy, and gemmotherapy, phytopharmaceuticals, anthroposophy and Electro-acupuncture Voll
1988 B&T joins DHU, VSM, Schwabe, and Natures’s Way
1988 HPUS begins transition from a cookbook to a world acclaimed regulatory document
1994 HPCUS begins a massive, expensive project to develop standards and control data for homeopathic remedies.

Native industry takes advantage of the new regulatory environment and resurges.
Hahnemann Laboratories, Joe Lillard Washington Homeopathic Products (WHP), Natural Health Products begin operations. Similisan, Coldeze, Zicam begin operations.

2004 I am appointed chief pharmacist at TXOptions Pharmacy and Homeopathic Laboratories, PA in King of Prussia, a division of SHC. Visit www.TxOptions.com

2005 HPUS-RS On-line provides reasonable accessibility to everyone from single one-day users
weekly, yearly and to the international homeopathic industry.

CURRENT EVENTS

2005 Standards and controls (assay data) continues for all remedies
2005 P.T.W. G. reviews twenty remedies/year@ $8000.00
2006 FDA expresses a renewed interest in “safety” of homeopathics (Mad Cow)
2007 APhA Will approach Congress to hold Homeopathic Drug Products (HDP)s to allopathic standards. This will be echoed by BBB, and their National Advertising Division (NAD)

Report of the 2002 APhA House of Delegates
Actions of the official legislative body of the American Pharmaceutical Association.
Adopted Policies
The following policies were adopted by the 2002 APhA House of Delegates and are now official
Association policy:
S60 supplement to the Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association
Homeopathy
1. APhA supports the demonstration of safety and efficacy of homeopathic products from adequate, well-designed scientific studies before pharmacists advocate or sell homeopathic products.
2. APhA recognizes patient autonomy regarding the use of homeopathic products. Pharmacists should educate patients who choose to use homeopathic products.
3. APhA shall work with Congress to modify the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act or enact other legislation to require that homeopathic manufacturers provide evidence of efficacy and safety for all products, including products currently in the marketplace.

2007 Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) issued Dec 07, distributed March 07. 2007 Demand for “clinical studies” for Similisan, Heads Up by BBB, NAD, Consumer reports and soon FTC.
2007 FDA CAM report
Separates us from all other complementary and alternative medical methods and reinforces our core reliance on Provings and Principles.

The US Dept of Health and Human Services FDA, Center for Biologics Revaluation and Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Center for Devices and Radiological Health and Center published this paper December 2006 for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

In the review of biologically based practices, energy medicine, mind body medicines and whole medical systems, homeopathy was examined, but not changed. I believe our regulatory environment is benefiting from the drug status of Homeopathic Drug Products, particularly the mention of HPCUS within the meaning of “drug” in the FDCA as mentioned in the FDA guidance on CAM products.

Important Considerations

FUNCTION OF PHARMACOPOEIA:
The HPUS is the envy of every other country. It is the only non-governmental homeopathic pharmacopeia in the world and is the standard used by many foreign countries. Acceptance of a remedy by the HPCUS is equivalent to an NDA. This is a fragile arrangement we have with FDA and is dependent upon the HPCUS’s ability to demonstrate proper oversight esp. in regard to safety.

HPCUS is a standard-setting organization that focuses on the regulatory approval of official homeopathic drug products and the development and publication of general pharmacy practices and standards. Currently the HPCUS tasks are:

Publish and disseminate the Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS).
Discover and monograph homeopathic medicines, (sponsored & Homeopathic Community)
Establish standards for manufacture and testing,
Establish standardized procedures and processes for manufacturing Homeopathic Drug products (HDPs).

In addition, the FDA anticipates that the HPCUS will exercise proper oversight for identification, preparation and safety of homeopathic remedies and establish appropriate (safe) dosage levels for those remedies, due to increased availability of new dosage forms.

Homeopathic remedies are DRUGS.
Articles recognized in the USP, HPUS or NF
Articles intended for use in diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease
Articles (other than food) intended to effect the structure or function of the body

At his time here are only two classes of drugs: Rx and Non-Rx OTC DRUG
No Statutory Definition
Drug for which adequate directions for use by layman can be written
(Rx drugs are exempt from this requirement)
A drug for self-limiting conditions which a consumer can diagnose and treat by himself/herself

Some Homeopathic Drug Remedies are Rx Because:
They are not labeled for self-limiting conditions (Hypertension, Diabetes,)
The condition requires diagnosis & monitoring (Crataegus, Cactus)
It may be in a toxic dosage form. (Digitalis MT, Belladonna MT, Arnica MT)
It may not be official because it cannot be accurately described (Carcinosinum)
It may be unofficial for other reasons.
Never submitted for monographing because no sponsor or lack of interest or lacking qualifications.

There are 1400 official homeopathic remedies
450 are restricted is some potencies. E.g. Belladonna Tr. is Rx 3X is non Rx
A few are restricted in all potencies. E.g. Crataegus, Only use is cardiotonic.

NEW DRUG
Any drug, which is not generally recognized as safe and effective by qualified experts for it’s labeled uses.
Any drug, which is so recognized, but which has not been used to a material time or to a material extent.

September/October 2002 Vol. 42, No. 5, Suppl. 1 Vol 42,
In Addition from Compliance Policy Guide (CPG)\ Homeopathic Drug. The CPG defines a homeopathic drug as any drug labeled as being "homeopathic" which in listed in the HPUS, or an addendum or supplement to it. Although this definition would appear to exclude all other substances, the CPG does recognize that some homeopathic remedies are not listed in the HPUS, or an addendum or supplement. In the CPG section dealing with declaration of ingredients, FDA states "Documentation must be provided to support that those products or ingredients which are not recognized officially in the HPUS, an addendum to it, or its supplements are generally recognized as homeopathic products or ingredients.” The need to demonstrate that a product or ingredient not recognized by the HPUS or an addendum or supplement to it is indeed homeopathic could arise either in an enforcement proceeding or in connection with an attempt to bring the product through U.S. Customs. For such products, it in clear that the burden of demonstrating its homeopathic status in on the person offering it for sale or importation. Finally, the CPG notes that a product containing a combination of homeopathic and non-homeopathic active ingredients is not considered to be a homeopathic drug product.

In addition from CPG

Prescription/OTC Status. Homeopathic drugs are subject to the same criteria as non-homeopathic drugs in determining whether they may be marketed as over-the-counter ("OTC") products. Specifically, a drug within the scope of the following statutory criteria must be dispensed only pursuant to a prescription:
1.a drug that is habit-forming;
2 a drug that in not safe-for use except under the supervision of a licensed medical practitioner because of its toxicity, method of use, or necessary collateral measures; or
3. drug that is explicitly approved in a new drug application only for dispensing pursuant to a prescription.

21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1); section 503(b)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA interprets this provision to mean that only homeopathic products intended for self-limiting disease conditions amenable to self-treatment may be marketed as OTC products. All other products must be marketed as prescription products.
In any case in which the HPUS specifies more stringent criteria for OTC use than do FDA regulations, the former will apply.

Health Fraud
Agency personnel will consider whether a homeopathic drug is being promoted significantly beyond recognized or customary practice of homeopathy in assessing the possibility of health fraud.

IN CONCLUSION
If homeopathy is to survive and serve the homeopathic community, we must support the HPCUS. The HPCUS is vigilant and, when it becomes opportune, we will support a third class of drugs for qualified homeopathic practitioners.

I cannot close without sharing my recollection of the turbulent days of the pharmacopoeia convention when Dr. Wyrth Post Baker was still with us. I will always be grateful for the dedication of Drs. Chase and Shevin, when we visited with the FDA and explained to the FDA “Who We Are”. We achieved credibility during those meetings. It is the reason we are treated differently and fairly.

In addition, we should all be grateful for the financial assistance of Boiron and Standard are supporting the Potency Table Working Group (PTWG) efforts, which are costing $8,000 per year. Acceleration of the effort, through other contributions, would be beneficial.

And a special thank you to Drs. Chase and Wember for their successful efforts to achieve a annual renewable grant from the The Woodward Foundation.

Excellent references
The Life of Hering - Calvin Brobst Knerr
Faces of Homeopathy Winston
The Social Transformation of American Medicine - Pulitzer Prize, Paul Starr
http://www.homeowatch.org/reg/meeting.html a pivotal meeting with FDA
Google: Research Report National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Its from NIH and it’s an Eye Opener.

ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.

My Account   |  Product List  |  Customer Service  |  Newsletter  |  Request Catalogue  |  Shopping Basket  |  Search